Markowitz Variance May Vastly Undervalue or Overestimate Portfolio Variance and Risks
Victor Olkhov

TL;DR
This paper shows that traditional Markowitz portfolio variance often misestimates actual market risk because it ignores trade volume fluctuations, which can lead to significant under- or overestimation of portfolio risks.
Contribution
The paper introduces a market-based variance model that accounts for trade volume fluctuations, extending Markowitz's variance approximation and highlighting its limitations.
Findings
Markowitz variance assumes constant trade volumes.
Trade volume fluctuations significantly affect portfolio risk estimates.
Market-based variance can vastly differ from Markowitz's approximation.
Abstract
We consider the investor who doesn't trade shares of his portfolio. The investor only observes the current trades made in the market with his securities to estimate the current return, variance, and risks of his unchanged portfolio. We show how the time series of consecutive trades made in the market with the securities of the portfolio can determine the time series that model the trades with the portfolio as with a single security. That establishes the equal description of the market-based variance of the securities and of the portfolio composed of these securities that account for the fluctuations of the volumes of the consecutive trades. We show that Markowitz's (1952) variance describes only the approximation when all volumes of the consecutive trades with securities are assumed constant. The market-based variance depends on the coefficient of variation of fluctuations of volumes of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
