Requirements for Joint Orbital Characterization of Cold Giants and Habitable Worlds with Habitable Worlds Observatory
Sabina Sagynbayeva, Asif Abbas, Stephen R. Kane, Eric L. Nielsen, William Thompson, Sarah Blunt, Malena Rice, Jessie L. Christiansen, Caleb K. Harada, Elisabeth R. Newton, Yasuhiro Hasegawa, Philip J. Armitage, Tansu Daylan

TL;DR
This paper establishes the technical requirements for the Habitable Worlds Observatory to effectively detect and characterize habitable planets and cold giants, emphasizing the importance of specific observational parameters.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of observational requirements, including coronagraph design, radial velocity precursor data, and astrometric measurements, to optimize joint detection and characterization of exoplanets.
Findings
A coronagraph OWA of 1440 mas is needed for 80-90% cold giant detection.
Approximately 40 radial velocity measurements with 1 m/s precision are required beforehand.
6-8 astrometric measurements significantly improve orbital parameter accuracy.
Abstract
We determine optimal requirements for the joint detection of habitable-zone planets and cold giant planets with the Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO). Analysis of 164 nearby stars shows that a coronagraph outer working angle (OWA) of 1440 milliarcseconds (mas) is necessary to achieve 80-90% visibility of cold giants. Approximately 40 precursor radial velocity measurements with 1 m/s precision are required to adequately constrain orbital parameters before HWO observations. We demonstrate that 6-8 astrometric measurements distributed across the mission timeline, compared to radial velocity constraints alone and to astrometry constraints alone, significantly improve orbital parameter precision, enabling direct determination of orbital inclination with uncertainties of 0.8-3 degrees. For habitable-zone planet characterization, 4-5 epochs provide moderate confidence, while high-confidence…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
