How Growing Toxicity Manifests: A Topic Trajectory Analysis of U.S. Immigration Discourse on Social Media
Una Joh, Yiqi Li, Jeff Hemsley

TL;DR
This study analyzes how toxicity in U.S. immigration discussions on social media evolves over time, revealing that increasing toxicity correlates with alarmist topics while decreasing toxicity aligns with policy discussions.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel pipeline combining hierarchical topic discovery and trajectory analysis to study toxicity dynamics in large-scale social media discourse.
Findings
Users with increasing toxicity shift toward alarmist, fear-based topics.
Users with decreasing toxicity focus more on legal and policy issues.
Both groups' trajectories significantly differ from their reference groups.
Abstract
In the online public sphere, discussions about immigration often become increasingly fractious, marked by toxic language and polarization. Drawing on 4 million X posts over six months, we combine a user- and topic-centric approach to study how shifts in toxicity manifest as topical shifts. Our topic discovery method, which leverages instruction-based embeddings and recursive HDBSCAN, uncovers 157 fine-grained subtopics within the U.S. immigration discourse. We focus on users in four groups: (1) those with increasing toxicity, (2) those with decreasing toxicity, and two reference groups with no significant toxicity trend but matched toxicity levels. Treating each posting history as a trajectory through a five-dimensional topic space, we compare average group trajectories using permutational MANOVA. Our findings show that users with increasing toxicity drift toward alarmist, fear-based…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
