Impact of eHMI on Pedestrians' Interactions with Level-5 Automated Driving Systems
Viktoria Marcus, Griffin Pitts, Sanaz Motamedi

TL;DR
This study shows that external human-machine interfaces (eHMIs) on Level-5 automated vehicles improve pedestrian understanding, safety perceptions, and trust, leading to more confident and earlier crossing decisions in simulated scenarios.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence that eHMIs enhance pedestrian-ADS communication, with visual cues being more necessary, thereby advancing design guidelines for safer autonomous vehicle interactions.
Findings
Pedestrians crossed earlier with eHMIs
Perceived safety and trust increased significantly
Visual eHMI features preferred over auditory cues
Abstract
Each year, over half of global traffic fatalities involve vulnerable road users (e.g. pedestrians), often due to human error. Level-5 automated driving systems (ADSs) could reduce driver errors contributing to pedestrian accidents, though effectiveness depends on clarity and understandability for other road users. External human-machine interfaces (eHMIs) have been proposed to facilitate pedestrian-ADS communication, though consensus on optimal eHMI features remains unclear. In an online survey, 153 participants responded to road-crossing scenarios involving level-5 ADSs, with and without eHMIs. With eHMIs, pedestrians crossed earlier and more confidently, and reported significantly increased perceptions of safety, trust, and understanding when interacting with level-5 ADSs. Visual eHMI features (including a text display and external speedometer) were ranked more necessary than auditory…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
