Numerical PDE solvers outperform neural PDE solvers
Patrick Chatain, Michael Rizvi-Martel, Guillaume Rabusseau, Adam Oberman

TL;DR
DeepFDM is a novel differentiable finite-difference framework that accurately learns PDE coefficients, outperforming neural PDE solvers in stability, efficiency, and interpretability across various scalar PDE benchmarks.
Contribution
Introduces DeepFDM, a stable, interpretable, and efficient finite-difference-based neural framework for learning spatially varying PDE coefficients, outperforming neural PDE solvers.
Findings
DeepFDM achieves 10-20X lower errors than neural PDE solvers.
Requires 10-20X fewer training epochs.
Uses 5-50X fewer parameters.
Abstract
We present DeepFDM, a differentiable finite-difference framework for learning spatially varying coefficients in time-dependent partial differential equations (PDEs). By embedding a classical forward-Euler discretization into a convolutional architecture, DeepFDM enforces stability and first-order convergence via CFL-compliant coefficient parameterizations. Model weights correspond directly to PDE coefficients, yielding an interpretable inverse-problem formulation. We evaluate DeepFDM on a benchmark suite of scalar PDEs: advection, diffusion, advection-diffusion, reaction-diffusion and inhomogeneous Burgers' equations-in one, two and three spatial dimensions. In both in-distribution and out-of-distribution tests (quantified by the Hellinger distance between coefficient priors), DeepFDM attains normalized mean-squared errors one to two orders of magnitude smaller than Fourier Neural…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
