Safety Features for a Centralised AGI Project
Sarah Hastings-Woodhouse

TL;DR
This paper discusses the risks of rapid AGI development and proposes a centralized US government approach with safety features to mitigate potential security threats.
Contribution
It introduces a framework of safety features and priorities for centralized AGI development to enhance security and risk management.
Findings
Identification of four high-level priorities for centralized AGI development
Proposal of seven safety features to reduce risks
Analysis of potential security threats from unregulated AGI progress
Abstract
Recent AI progress has outpaced expectations, with some experts now predicting AI that matches or exceeds human capabilities in all cognitive areas (AGI) could emerge this decade, potentially posing grave national and global security threats. AI development is currently occurring primarily in the private sector with minimal oversight. This report analyzes a scenario where the US government centralizes AGI development under its direct control, and identifies four high-level priorities and seven safety features to reduce risks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
