Strict Comparisons of Infinite Utility Streams
Michael Greinecker, Michael Nielsen

TL;DR
This paper constructs a preference relation on infinite utility streams that is non-discriminatory, Pareto-efficient, and almost always strictly comparable, challenging previous claims about intergenerational equity.
Contribution
It provides a counterexample to prior assertions by demonstrating a preference relation with these properties on infinite utility streams.
Findings
Existence of a preference relation satisfying key fairness and comparability criteria.
Counterexample to the claim that such preferences cannot exist.
Challenges assumptions in intergenerational equity theory.
Abstract
There exists a preference relation on infinite utility streams that does not discriminate between different periods, satisfies the Pareto criterion, and so that almost all pairs of utility streams are strictly comparable. Such a preference relation provides a counterexample to a claim in [Zame, William R. ``Can intergenerational equity be operationalized?'' Theoretical Economics 2.2 (2007): 187-202.]
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsClimate Change Policy and Economics · Economic theories and models · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
