Causal Inference when Intervention Units and Outcome Units Differ
Georgia Papadogeorgou, Zhaoyan Song, Guido Imbens, Fabrizia Mealli

TL;DR
This paper develops causal inference methods for bipartite interference settings with distinct intervention and outcome units, introducing unbiased estimators that accommodate complex treatment effects and network structures.
Contribution
It introduces new causal estimands and unbiased weighting estimators for bipartite interference, allowing for heterogeneity and non-linear effects without restrictive assumptions.
Findings
Proposes unbiased estimators for bipartite causal effects.
Derives variance and proves consistency of estimators.
Discusses positivity violations in real-world network data.
Abstract
We study causal inference in settings characterized by interference with a bipartite structure. There are two distinct sets of units: intervention units to which an intervention can be applied and outcome units on which the outcome of interest can be measured. Outcome units may be affected by interventions on some, but not all, intervention units, as captured by a bipartite graph. Examples of this setting can be found in analyses of the impact of pollution abatement in plants on health outcomes for individuals, or the effect of transportation network expansions on regional economic activity. We introduce and discuss a variety of old and new causal estimands for these bipartite settings. We do not impose restrictions on the functional form of the exposure mapping and the potential outcomes, thus allowing for heterogeneity, non-linearity, non-additivity, and potential interactions in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
