LRR-Bench: Left, Right or Rotate? Vision-Language models Still Struggle With Spatial Understanding Tasks
Fei Kong, Jinhao Duan, Kaidi Xu, Zhenhua Guo, Xiaofeng Zhu, Xiaoshuang Shi

TL;DR
This paper introduces LRR-Bench, a synthetic benchmark to evaluate vision-language models' spatial understanding, revealing significant gaps compared to human performance, especially on complex spatial tasks.
Contribution
The work presents a new synthetic dataset and evaluation pipeline specifically designed to assess VLMs' spatial perception capabilities, highlighting their current limitations.
Findings
Humans perform near-perfect on all spatial tasks.
VLMs only match human performance on simple tasks.
VLMs perform poorly on complex spatial understanding tasks.
Abstract
Real-world applications, such as autonomous driving and humanoid robot manipulation, require precise spatial perception. However, it remains underexplored how Vision-Language Models (VLMs) recognize spatial relationships and perceive spatial movement. In this work, we introduce a spatial evaluation pipeline and construct a corresponding benchmark. Specifically, we categorize spatial understanding into two main types: absolute spatial understanding, which involves querying the absolute spatial position (e.g., left, right) of an object within an image, and 3D spatial understanding, which includes movement and rotation. Notably, our dataset is entirely synthetic, enabling the generation of test samples at a low cost while also preventing dataset contamination. We conduct experiments on multiple state-of-the-art VLMs and observe that there is significant room for improvement in their…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
