Comparative Analysis of Data-Driven Predictive Control Strategies
Sohrab Rezaei, Ali Khaki-Sedigh

TL;DR
This paper systematically compares leading data-driven predictive control strategies, analyzing their theoretical bases, assumptions, and performance through a numerical benchmark.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive review and comparison of three major data-driven predictive control methods, highlighting their theoretical differences and practical implications.
Findings
The strategies have distinct theoretical foundations and assumptions.
Performance varies significantly depending on the control scenario.
The numerical benchmark offers a rigorous basis for comparison.
Abstract
This paper compares data-driven predictive control strategies by examining their theoretical foundations, assumptions, and applications. The three most widely recognized and consequential methods, Data Enabled Predictive Control, Willems-Koopman Predictive Control, Model-Free Adaptive Predictive Control are employed. Each of these strategies is systematically reviewed, and the primary theories supporting it are outlined. Following analysis, a discussion is provided regarding their fundamental assumptions, emphasizing their influence on control effectiveness. A numerical example is presented as a benchmark for comparison to enable a rigorous performance evaluation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
