Modeling Parkinson's Disease Progression Using Longitudinal Voice Biomarkers: A Comparative Study of Statistical and Neural Mixed-Effects Models
Ran Tong, Lanruo Wang, Tong Wang, Wei Yan

TL;DR
This study compares statistical and neural mixed-effects models for analyzing longitudinal voice data to monitor Parkinson's disease progression, highlighting the strengths of GAMMs in small-sample settings.
Contribution
It demonstrates that GAMMs outperform neural mixed-effects models in small datasets for Parkinson's progression prediction, emphasizing interpretability and predictive accuracy.
Findings
GAMMs achieved the lowest prediction error (MSE 6.56).
Neural mixed-effects models tend to overfit in small samples.
Larger cohorts are needed for neural models to be reliable.
Abstract
Longitudinal voice biomarkers provide a non-invasive source of information for monitoring Parkinson's disease progression, but their statistical analysis is difficult because repeated measurements from the same subject are correlated, clinical cohorts are often small, and disease trajectories can vary substantially across individuals. This study evaluates statistical and neural mixed-effects approaches for modeling Parkinson's disease progression from telemonitoring voice data. Using the Oxford Parkinson's telemonitoring dataset (N=42), we compare Neural Mixed Effects (NME) models, Generalized Neural Network Mixed Models (GNMMs), and semi-parametric Generalized Additive Mixed Models (GAMMs) under the same longitudinal prediction setting. The results show that neural mixed-effects models provide flexible nonlinear representations but can overfit severely in this small-sample setting,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
