Retrospective score tests versus prospective score tests for genetic association with case-control data
Yukun Liu, Pengfei Li, Lei Song, Kai Yu, and Jing Qin

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new retrospective likelihood-based score test for genetic association studies, demonstrating improved power over traditional prospective methods, especially for rare variants and multiple markers.
Contribution
The paper develops a retrospective likelihood-based score test for genetic association, enhancing power by utilizing disease prevalence information, unlike traditional prospective approaches.
Findings
Retrospective score test outperforms prospective in simulations
Utilizing disease prevalence improves test efficiency
Real GWAS data confirms advantages of the new method
Abstract
Since the seminal work by Prentice and Pyke (1979), the prospective logistic likelihood has become the standard method of analysis for retrospectively collected case-control data, in particular for testing the association between a single genetic marker and a disease outcome in genetic case-control studies. When studying multiple genetic markers with relatively small effects, especially those with rare variants, various aggregated approaches based on the same prospective likelihood have been developed to integrate subtle association evidence among all considered markers. In this paper we show that using the score statistic derived from a prospective likelihood is not optimal in the analysis of retrospectively sampled genetic data. We develop the locally most powerful genetic aggregation test derived through the retrospective likelihood under a random effect model assumption. In contrast…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
