Is Exchangeability better than I.I.D to handle Data Distribution Shifts while Pooling Data for Data-scarce Medical image segmentation?
Ayush Roy, Samin Enam, Jun Xia, Won Hwa Kim, Vishnu Suresh Lokhande

TL;DR
This paper explores whether assuming exchangeability rather than i.i.d. conditions better handles distribution shifts in data pooling for medical image segmentation, proposing a method that improves feature representation and achieves state-of-the-art results.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach based on causal insights to control feature discrepancies across network layers, enhancing segmentation performance under data addition scenarios.
Findings
Achieves state-of-the-art segmentation on five datasets.
Demonstrates improved feature representations across models.
Provides qualitative evidence of more accurate segmentation maps.
Abstract
Data scarcity is a major challenge in medical imaging, particularly for deep learning models. While data pooling (combining datasets from multiple sources) and data addition (adding more data from a new dataset) have been shown to enhance model performance, they are not without complications. Specifically, increasing the size of the training dataset through pooling or addition can induce distributional shifts, negatively affecting downstream model performance, a phenomenon known as the "Data Addition Dilemma". While the traditional i.i.d. assumption may not hold in multi-source contexts, assuming exchangeability across datasets provides a more practical framework for data pooling. In this work, we investigate medical image segmentation under these conditions, drawing insights from causal frameworks to propose a method for controlling foreground-background feature discrepancies across…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
