Learning Long-Range Representations with Equivariant Messages
Egor Rumiantsev, Marcel F. Langer, Tulga-Erdene Sodjargal, Michele Ceriotti, Philip Loche

TL;DR
This paper introduces LOREM, a graph neural network architecture that uses equivariant charges for long-range interactions, enabling consistent and accurate modeling of non-local physical effects in atomic systems.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel equivariant message-passing neural network, LOREM, that effectively captures long-range physical effects without extensive hyperparameter tuning.
Findings
LOREM outperforms existing methods on datasets emphasizing non-local effects.
Equivariant long-range message passing improves accuracy over scalar approaches.
LOREM demonstrates consistent performance across various datasets.
Abstract
Machine learning interatomic potentials trained on first-principles reference data are becoming valuable tools for computational physics, biology, and chemistry. Equivariant message-passing neural networks, including transformers, achieve state-of-the-art accuracy but rely on cutoff-based graphs, limiting their ability to capture long-range effects such as electrostatics or dispersion, as well as electron delocalization. While long-range correction schemes based on inverse power laws of interatomic distances have been proposed, they are unable to communicate higher-order geometric information and are thus limited in applicability. To address this shortcoming, we propose the use of equivariant, rather than scalar, charges for long-range interactions, and design a graph neural network architecture, LOREM, around this long-range message passing mechanism. We consider several datasets…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Conference Withdrawn Submission
The evaluation of the method shows a good improvement over previous models. Overall, the evaluation is well presented and complete. The paper is generally clear, but is lacking in the method description (section 4) In general, the paper addresses an important aspect of modeling long-range interactions.
Equation (1) (and the all session) is, in theory, the main contribution of the paper, but it has many inaccuracies.
- The paper structure is organized well and adequately narrows down an issue of conventional MLIPs the authors address in the paper. The problem is timely and on point. - The idea of incorporating Ewald summation sounds natural as a means to model long-range interactions.
**Vague description for the equivariance on the proposed representation:** Description about group equivariance/invariance is loose in general. When the core idea (1) is introduced, the type of group and the definition of its action are not clarified at all. Even when I assume the canonical orthogonal action (resp. translation) of $O(3)$ (resp. $\mathbb{Z}^{3}$) on $\mathbb{R}^{3}$, it is unclear how the equation (1) preserves those group actions, because the denominator has an additional term o
* While the contribution is narrows down to replacing a scalar with a vector entity within the ewald summation, it is a well defined one and a worthwhile investigation. * The paper is well written and can be understood easily. * The proposed method performs well on the presented benchmarks.
The scope of the empirical evaluation is to limited and focuses on small datasets representing single PES where explicit long-range interactions take place: * It would be great to see the performance on large-scale datasets such as OC20, Materials Project, etc. * A proper ablation needs to take place as all methods differ in their short and long-range message passing. To ease comparisons, different short range models should be combined with different long-range models like Kosmala, Unke, Chmiela
I appreciate the effort of the reviewers, especially in the introduction and background, in giving readers a general understanding of the problem being solved. ICLR is a generalist machine learning conference, and as such one expects that readers are well aware of machine learning basics rather than knowledge of computational chemistry. The paper is well written, the use of language appropriate and the organization are satisfactory. I believe that the results show, to some extent, that there i
Overall, my assessment is that this paper is very accessible to a computational chemist well familiar with methods and techniques, but completely obscure to the average reader of the machine learning conference. The impact of this manuscript on a generalist conference is therefore low. This is reinforced by several aspects I will talk about later, for instance that the current implementation is no more scalable than others which have O(N^2) cost: being “amenable” to optimization does not mean th
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced Graph Neural Networks · Quantum many-body systems
