Extreme Cardiac MRI Analysis under Respiratory Motion: Results of the CMRxMotion Challenge
Kang Wang, Chen Qin, Zhang Shi, Haoran Wang, Xiwen Zhang, Chen Chen, Cheng Ouyang, Chengliang Dai, Yuanhan Mo, Chenchen Dai, Xutong Kuang, Ruizhe Li, Xin Chen, Xiuzheng Yue, Song Tian, Alejandro Mora-Rubio, Kumaradevan Punithakumar, Shizhan Gong, Qi Dou, Sina Amirrajab

TL;DR
This paper introduces the CMRxMotion challenge, a dataset and benchmark for evaluating deep learning models' robustness in cardiac MRI analysis under respiratory motion artifacts, highlighting the impact on image quality and clinical biomarkers.
Contribution
It provides a curated dataset, challenge tasks, and evaluation framework for assessing and improving deep learning methods' robustness to motion artifacts in cardiac MRI.
Findings
Top algorithms achieved varying accuracy in quality assessment and segmentation.
Motion artifacts significantly affect the accuracy of clinical biomarkers.
The challenge promotes development of more robust cardiac MRI analysis methods.
Abstract
Deep learning models have achieved state-of-the-art performance in automated Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) analysis. However, the efficacy of these models is highly dependent on the availability of high-quality, artifact-free images. In clinical practice, CMR acquisitions are frequently degraded by respiratory motion, yet the robustness of deep learning models against such artifacts remains an underexplored problem. To promote research in this domain, we organized the MICCAI CMRxMotion challenge. We curated and publicly released a dataset of 320 CMR cine series from 40 healthy volunteers who performed specific breathing protocols to induce a controlled spectrum of motion artifacts. The challenge comprised two tasks: 1) automated image quality assessment to classify images based on motion severity, and 2) robust myocardial segmentation in the presence of motion artifacts. A total of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
