How is science discussed on Bluesky?
Er-Te Zheng, Xiaorui Jiang, Zhichao Fang, Mike Thelwall

TL;DR
This study analyzes scholarly article dissemination on Bluesky, revealing its growing role in science communication with higher engagement and originality compared to other platforms, indicating its potential as a new source of altmetrics.
Contribution
First large-scale analysis of scholarly dissemination on Bluesky, demonstrating its emerging significance for science communication and altmetrics.
Findings
Sharp increase in scholarly activity from Nov 2024 to Jan 2025.
Posts mainly concern health, social, environmental sciences.
Higher engagement and textual originality than on X.
Abstract
Amid the migration of academics from X, the social media platform Bluesky has emerged as a potential alternative. To assess its viability and relevance for science communication, this study presents the first large-scale analysis of scholarly article dissemination on Bluesky, exploring its potential as a new source of social media metrics. We collected and analysed over 2.6 million Bluesky posts referencing 532,302 scholarly articles from January 2023 to July 2025, integrating metadata from the OpenAlex database. Temporal trends, disciplinary coverage, language use, textual characteristics, and user engagement were examined. A sharp increase in scholarly activity on Bluesky was observed from November 2024 to January 2025, coinciding with broader academic shifts away from X. As on X, Bluesky posts primarily concern the health, social, and environmental sciences and are predominantly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsClimate Change Communication and Perception · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Academic Publishing and Open Access
