On decoherence in surface hopping: the nonadiabaticity threshold
Johan E. Runeson

TL;DR
This paper introduces a threshold-based decoherence correction for surface hopping that improves accuracy by limiting decoherence to regions of low nonadiabaticity, applicable across various systems.
Contribution
It proposes a simple, general strategy to improve decoherence modeling in surface hopping by using a nonadiabaticity threshold, enhancing accuracy and applicability.
Findings
Gaussian overlap correction yields better populations than no correction.
Threshold-based decoherence is effective across different systems.
Instantaneous decoherence is appropriate under specific conditions.
Abstract
This work presents a strategy to efficiently and safely account for decoherence in the fewest switches surface hopping method. Standard decoherence corrections often lead to too strong coherence suppression. A simple and general solution to this problem is to restrict decoherence to regions of low nonadiabaticity measured by the dimensionless Massey parameter. The same threshold values are suitable for a variety of systems, regardless of their size and absolute energy scale. When restricted to uncoupled regions, a Gaussian overlap decoherence correction consistently leads to more accurate populations than using no correction. The article also examines under what circumstances it is appropriate to decohere instantaneously.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
