The $d$-distance $p$-packing domination number: complexity, cycles, and trees
Csilla Bujt\'as, Vesna Ir\v{s}i\v{c} Chenoweth, Sandi Klav\v{z}ar, Gang Zhang

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity and structural properties of the $d$-distance $p$-packing domination number in graphs, providing NP-completeness results, exact formulas for cycles, and bounds for trees.
Contribution
It introduces new bounds and characterizations for the $d$-distance $p$-packing domination number, extending previous results and analyzing the problem's complexity.
Findings
NP-completeness for bipartite planar graphs
Exact $oldsymbol{eta_d^p(C_n)}$ for cycles
Bounds on $oldsymbol{eta_d^p(T)}$ for trees
Abstract
A set of vertices is a -distance dominating set if for every there exists such that , and is a -packing if for every different . The -distance -packing domination number of is the minimum size of a set of vertices of which is both a -distance dominating set and a -packing. It is proved that for every two fixed integers and with and , the decision problem whether holds is NP-complete for bipartite planar graphs. A necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a -distance -packing dominating set in is obtained and determined for every , , and . For a tree on vertices with leaves and support vertices it is proved that (i)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Cellular Automata and Applications · graph theory and CDMA systems
