TL;DR
This paper introduces a theoretical method to bound the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) of a random variable by leveraging an auxiliary variable with bounded discrepancies, aiding in risk estimation when direct data is limited.
Contribution
It develops a novel framework for bounding CVaR using related variables with bounded discrepancies, enabling practical risk assessment with limited information.
Findings
Provides bounds for CVaR using auxiliary distributions
Offers concentration inequalities for tail risk control
Facilitates risk estimation with limited data
Abstract
In this paper, we develop a theoretical framework for bounding the CVaR of a random variable using another related random variable , under assumptions on their cumulative and density functions. Our results yield practical tools for approximating when direct information about is limited or sampling is computationally expensive, by exploiting a more tractable or observable random variable . Moreover, the derived bounds provide interpretable concentration inequalities that quantify how the tail risk of can be controlled via .
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
- The theoretical derivations seem mostly sound and consistent. - The paper provides an alternative interpretable expression of existing concentration inequalities, replacing reweighted-order-statistic formulas by CVaR-form bounds.
- The novelty of theoretical results is very limited. The work seems to provide a unified and interpretable formulation of CVaR bounds and concentration inequalities, but the mathematical content closely mirrors existing literature. Most results restate or directly follow from existing CVaR inequalities (Brown 2007; Thomas & Learned-Miller 2019). In addition, the claimed generalization to auxiliary distributions is conceptually interesting but limited in novelty. The key ideas of using stochast
The paper demonstrates strong originality by addressing a critical gap in CVaR estimation: rigorous, interpretable bounds for hard-to-sample random variables X via tractable auxiliary Y—a need unmet by existing work. Unlike classical CVaR methods (relying on direct sampling of X) or Thomas & Learned-Miller (2019)’s concentration bounds (limited to empirical distributions and framed via order statistics), it innovatively constructs a framework linking \(CVaR_\alpha(X)\) to CVaR of Y using uniform
My main concern is the applicability of the results in the manuscript. See detailed comments in "Questions" section.
See main review
See main review
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
