Model-robust standardization in stepped wedge designs
Xi Fang, Xueqi Wang, Patrick J. Heagerty, Bingkai Wang, Fan Li

TL;DR
This paper introduces a model-robust standardization framework for stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trials, enabling consistent estimation of treatment effects under informative sizes and model misspecification.
Contribution
It generalizes existing methods by defining multiple causal estimands and proposing an augmented estimator that remains robust under arbitrary model misspecification.
Findings
The proposed estimators perform well in finite samples across various designs.
Simulation studies demonstrate robustness to informative cluster sizes.
Application to real SW-CRTs shows practical utility of the method.
Abstract
Stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trials (SW-CRTs) are widely used in healthcare and implementation science, providing an ethical advantage by ensuring all clusters eventually receive the intervention. The staggered rollout of treatment introduces complexities in defining and estimating treatment effect estimands, particularly under informative sizes. Traditional model-based methods, including generalized estimating equations (GEE) and linear mixed models (LMM), produce estimates that depend on implicit weighting schemes and parametric assumptions, leading to bias for different types of estimands in the presence of informative sizes. While recent methods have attempted to provide robust estimation in SW-CRTs, they are restrictive on modeling assumptions or lack of general framework for consistent estimating multiple estimands under informative size. In this article, we propose a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
