Sparse-View 3D Reconstruction: Recent Advances and Open Challenges
Tanveer Younis, Zhanglin Cheng

TL;DR
This survey reviews recent advances in sparse-view 3D reconstruction, focusing on neural implicit models, explicit point-cloud methods, and hybrid approaches, highlighting challenges and future directions for real-time, unconstrained applications.
Contribution
It provides a unified perspective on geometry-based, neural implicit, and generative methods, analyzing their trade-offs and outlining open challenges in the field.
Findings
Neural implicit models improve reconstruction in sparse views.
Explicit point-cloud methods like 3D Gaussian Splatting enhance accuracy.
Hybrid models leveraging diffusion and foundation models address artifacts.
Abstract
Sparse-view 3D reconstruction is essential for applications in which dense image acquisition is impractical, such as robotics, augmented/virtual reality (AR/VR), and autonomous systems. In these settings, minimal image overlap prevents reliable correspondence matching, causing traditional methods, such as structure-from-motion (SfM) and multiview stereo (MVS), to fail. This survey reviews the latest advances in neural implicit models (e.g., NeRF and its regularized versions), explicit point-cloud-based approaches (e.g., 3D Gaussian Splatting), and hybrid frameworks that leverage priors from diffusion and vision foundation models (VFMs).We analyze how geometric regularization, explicit shape modeling, and generative inference are used to mitigate artifacts such as floaters and pose ambiguities in sparse-view settings. Comparative results on standard benchmarks reveal key trade-offs…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topics3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Advanced Vision and Imaging
