Biological detail and graph structure in network neuroscience
David Papo, Javier M. Buld\'u

TL;DR
This paper discusses how incorporating detailed neurophysiological information and more complex network structures can enhance our understanding of brain function and phenomenology in network neuroscience.
Contribution
It explores the potential benefits of increasing biological detail and network complexity in neural models to better understand brain dynamics.
Findings
Increased neurophysiological detail may improve model accuracy.
Complex network structures can capture richer brain dynamics.
Simplifying assumptions may limit understanding of brain function.
Abstract
Endowing brain anatomy, dynamics, and function with a network structure is becoming standard in neuroscience. In its simplest form, a network is a collection of units and relationships between them. The pattern of relations among the units encodes numerous properties which have been shown to have a profound effect on networked systems' dynamics and function. In an effort to strike a balance between idealization and detail, network neuroscience studies typically involve simplifying assumptions at both neural and network modeling levels. However, the extent to which existing neural models depend on such approximations is as yet poorly understood. Here, we discuss whether and how increasing neurophysiological detail and generalizing the basic simple network structure often adopted in network neuroscience may help improve our understanding of brain phenomenology and function.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
