Why can't Epidemiology be automated (yet)?
David Bann, Ed Lowther, Liam Wright, Yevgeniya Kovalchuk

TL;DR
This paper explores the potential and limitations of applying AI to automate various tasks in epidemiology, highlighting current capabilities, challenges, and future opportunities for integration.
Contribution
It maps the landscape of epidemiological tasks suitable for AI, identifies current limitations, and demonstrates how agentic AI systems can perform epidemiological analysis.
Findings
AI improves coding and administrative efficiency
Limitations include AI hallucinations and data access barriers
AI can design and execute epidemiological analysis with variable quality
Abstract
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) - particularly generative AI - present new opportunities to accelerate, or even automate, epidemiological research. Unlike disciplines based on physical experimentation, a sizable fraction of Epidemiology relies on secondary data analysis and thus is well-suited for such augmentation. Yet, it remains unclear which specific tasks can benefit from AI interventions or where roadblocks exist. Awareness of current AI capabilities is also mixed. Here, we map the landscape of epidemiological tasks using existing datasets - from literature review to data access, analysis, writing up, and dissemination - and identify where existing AI tools offer efficiency gains. While AI can increase productivity in some areas such as coding and administrative tasks, its utility is constrained by limitations of existing AI models (e.g. hallucinations in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
