Input-Driven Pushdown Automata with Translucent Input Letters
Martin Kutrib, Andreas Malcher, Matthias Wendlandt

TL;DR
This paper explores input-driven pushdown automata with translucent input letters, analyzing their computational power, closure properties, and decidability issues, revealing differences between deterministic and nondeterministic models.
Contribution
It introduces and studies the computational and closure properties of translucent input letter automata, highlighting differences from traditional models and between deterministic and nondeterministic variants.
Findings
Nondeterministic models are computationally stronger than deterministic ones.
Non-returning models surpass returning models in computational strength.
Certain decision problems are non-semidecidable in nondeterministic models.
Abstract
Input-driven pushdown automata with translucent input letters are investigated. Here, the use of translucent input letters means that the input is processed in several sweeps and that, depending on the current state of the automaton, some input symbols are visible and can be processed, whereas some other symbols are invisible, and may be processed in another sweep. Additionally, the returning mode as well as the non-returning mode are considered, where in the former mode a new sweep must start after processing a visible input symbol. Input-driven pushdown automata differ from traditional pushdown automata by the fact that the actions on the pushdown store (push, pop, nothing) are dictated by the input symbols. We obtain the result that the input-driven nondeterministic model is computationally stronger than the deterministic model both in the returning mode and in the non-returning…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
