New Insights into the Nature and Orbital Motion of Aristotle's Comet in 372 BC
Zdenek Sekanina

TL;DR
This paper reexamines Aristotle's 372 BC comet using historical descriptions and orbital data, supporting its identification as the progenitor of Kreutz sungrazers and providing new insights into its orbit and appearance.
Contribution
It offers a novel analysis linking Aristotle's historical account with orbital models, clarifying the comet's perihelion timing and physical features.
Findings
The comet's perihelion likely occurred around January 20, 372 BC.
The comet's tail was a plasma feature stretching over 0.8 AU.
The comet was visible for more than 10 weeks.
Abstract
Extending the investigation of the presumed primordial comet as part of continuing work on a new model of the Kreutz sungrazer system, I confront a previously derived set of orbital elements with Aristotle's remarks in his Meteorologica to test their compatibility and determine the comet's perihelion time. The two translations of the treatise into English that I am familiar with differ at one point substantially from each other. Unambiguously, the year and season of the comet's appearance was early 372 BC (or -371). From Aristotle's constraint on the comet's setting relative to sunset, I infer that the probable date of perihelion passage was January 20, a date also consistent with the vague remark on frosty weather. On the day that Aristotle claims the comet was not seen, its head may have been hidden behind the Sun's disk or in contact with it. The observation that the `comet receded…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
