Terrestrial Planet Formation from Two Source Reservoirs
David Nesvorny, Alessandro Morbidelli, William F. Bottke, Rogerio Deienno, Max Goldberg

TL;DR
This paper presents detailed dynamical simulations of terrestrial planet formation from two source reservoirs, explaining planetary masses, orbits, compositions, and isotopic differences through varied initial conditions and migration processes.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive model of planet formation from two distinct reservoirs, incorporating migration effects and stochastic simulations to match observed planetary characteristics.
Findings
Mercury formed near the silicate sublimation line and remained close to its original location.
Venus and Earth migrated outward to 0.7-1 au via disk torques and magnetic winds.
Mars and Mars-sized protoplanets originated from an outer reservoir at 1.5-2 au.
Abstract
This work describes new dynamical simulations of terrestrial planet formation. The simulations started at the protoplanetary disk stage, when planetesimals formed and accreted into protoplanets, and continued past the late stage of giant impacts. We explored the effect of different parameters, such as the initial radial distribution of planetesimals and Type-I migration of protoplanets, on the final results. In each case, a thousand simulations were completed to characterize the stochastic nature of the accretion process. In the model best able to satisfy various constraints, Mercury, Venus, and Earth accreted from planetesimals that formed early near the silicate sublimation line near 0.5 au and migrated by disk torques. For Venus and Earth to end up at 0.7-1 au, Type-I migration had to be directed outward, for example as the magnetically driven winds reduced the surface gas density in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
