Coherent Ising Machines: The Good, The Bad, The Ugly
Farhad Khosravi, Martin Perreault, Artur Scherer, and Pooya Ronagh

TL;DR
This paper interprets the dynamics of coherent Ising machines (CIM) as solutions to Langevin stochastic differential equations, providing a new computational framework and highlighting the potential and limitations of hybrid optical-electronic systems.
Contribution
It offers a mean-field interpretation of CIM dynamics as Langevin SDEs, establishing a framework for understanding their operation and capabilities in solving optimization problems.
Findings
CIM can be viewed as a continuous state machine solving SDEs.
Hybrid digital-analog conversions limit optical speed and energy efficiency.
Fully analog implementations could significantly enhance performance.
Abstract
Analog computing using bosonic computational states is a leading approach to surpassing the computational speed and energy limitations of von Neumann architectures. But the challenges of manufacturing large-scale photonic integrated circuits (PIC) has led to hybrid solutions that integrate optical analog and electronic digital components. A notable example is the coherent Ising machine (CIM), that was primarily invented for solving quadratic binary optimization problems. In this paper, we focus on a mean-field interpretation of the dynamics of optical pulses in the CIM as solutions to Langevin dynamics, a stochastic differential equation (SDE) that plays a key role in non-convex optimization and generative AI. This interpretation establishes a computational framework for understanding the system's operation, the computational role of each component, and its performance, strengths, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
