On the Impossibility of Obtaining Time-Independent, Three-Dimensional, Spherically-Symmetric Densities of Confined Systems of Relativistically Moving Constituents
Gerald A. Miller

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates how to define consistent, time-independent two-dimensional densities for confined relativistic systems using light-front formalism, highlighting limitations of traditional three-dimensional density methods.
Contribution
It introduces a method to obtain valid two-dimensional densities in relativistic systems and critiques existing three-dimensional density approaches for violating fundamental principles.
Findings
Two-dimensional densities are consistent with quantum and relativistic restrictions.
Traditional three-dimensional density methods violate fundamental restrictions.
Using wave packets with zero spatial extent leads to densities vanishing over time.
Abstract
The quantum mechanical definition of probability, the uncertainty principle and Poincare invariance provide strong basic restrictions on the ability to define spatial densities associated with form factors describing the properties of confined systems of relativistically moving constituents. Despite this, many papers ignore one or more of these restrictions. Here I show how to obtain time-independent, two-dimensional densities that are consistent with the stated restrictions. This is done using the light-front, infinite momentum frame formalism. Two-dimensional density interpretations of the axial-vector form factor and all three gravitational form factors are obtained. Additionally, an expression of a two-dimensional mass density related to the trace of the energy momentum tensor is obtained. I also show that all known methods for finding three-dimensional densities: using the Breit…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
