Multi-population GAN Training: Analyzing Co-Evolutionary Algorithms
Walter P. Casas, Jamal Toutouh

TL;DR
This paper empirically analyzes co-evolutionary strategies for training GANs, highlighting that full generational replacement improves sample quality and diversity over elitist methods, guiding better population-based generative model design.
Contribution
It provides a comparative empirical study of co-evolutionary GAN training strategies, emphasizing the effectiveness of (mu,lambda) replacement over elitism and other schemes.
Findings
(mu,lambda) replacement outperforms other strategies in sample quality and diversity
Elitist approaches tend to converge prematurely and reduce diversity
Larger offspring sizes enhance the benefits of full generational replacement
Abstract
Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are powerful generative models but remain challenging to train due to pathologies suchas mode collapse and instability. Recent research has explored co-evolutionary approaches, in which populations of generators and discriminators are evolved, as a promising solution. This paper presents an empirical analysis of different coevolutionary GAN training strategies, focusing on the impact of selection and replacement mechanisms. We compare (mu,lambda), (mu+lambda) with elitism, and (mu+lambda) with tournament selection coevolutionary schemes, along with a non-evolutionary population based multi-generator multi-discriminator GAN baseline, across both synthetic low-dimensional datasets (blob and gaussian mixtures) and an image-based benchmark (MNIST). Results show that full generational replacement, i.e., (mu,lambda), consistently outperforms in terms of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
