Heat Kernel Goes Topological
Maximilian Krahn, Vikas Garg

TL;DR
This paper introduces a scalable topological framework using a Laplacian operator on combinatorial complexes to efficiently compute heat kernels, enabling expressive node descriptors for neural networks.
Contribution
It presents a novel Laplacian-based method for topological neural networks that is both computationally efficient and maximally expressive for complex structures.
Findings
Outperforms existing methods in computational efficiency
Achieves competitive results on molecular datasets
Excels at distinguishing complex topological structures
Abstract
Topological neural networks have emerged as powerful successors of graph neural networks. However, they typically involve higher-order message passing, which incurs significant computational expense. We circumvent this issue with a novel topological framework that introduces a Laplacian operator on combinatorial complexes (CCs), enabling efficient computation of heat kernels that serve as node descriptors. Our approach captures multiscale information and enables permutation-equivariant representations, allowing easy integration into modern transformer-based architectures. Theoretically, the proposed method is maximally expressive because it can distinguish arbitrary non-isomorphic CCs. Empirically, it significantly outperforms existing topological methods in terms of computational efficiency. Besides demonstrating competitive performance with the state-of-the-art descriptors on…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
[S1] The idea of applying heat kernels to Topological Deep Learning (TDL) is conceptually interesting and has not been explicitly explored in prior work. [S2] The proposed method is simple and clear (despite some of the writing being unclear).
[W1] Clarity and presentation – The paper suffers from numerous unclear passages, typographical errors, and missing explanations. Several central definitions and notations are not clearly introduced, which makes it difficult to follow the theoretical and experimental sections. (See Questions below for examples.) [W2] Theoretical soundness – Many of the theoretical results are either trivial, misleadingly framed, or possibly incorrect. (see Questions below for details) [W3] Experimental limitat
Overall the work is well presented and motivated. The full implementation of the experiments and various empirical experiments support the theoretical claims in the paper, which is appreciated by the reviewer. In particular stating the occurrence of the number of iso-spectral graphs / complexes in real-world dataset is important and appreciated.
While it is my belief that the work is an interesting contribution to the field, some questions remain for the reviewer after reading the paper. Please see the questions section.
* Solid analysis of Laplacian properties, uniqueness, and expressivity. The authors establish meaningful results that clarify the limits and strengths of spectral descriptors on CCs. * The method avoids higher-order message passing while retaining structural richness, leading to significantly faster inference and training, especially on large complexes. * Benchmarks show that TopoHKS performs competitively with or better than SMCN and other baselines, particularly in topologically sensitive ta
* Like other spectral methods, TopoHKS cannot distinguish between complexes that are isospectral but structurally different (non-isomorphic). Although such cases are uncommon in real-world data, this limitation reflects an important theoretical weakness in the model’s expressiveness. * The eigendecomposition step for computing HKS remains a bottleneck for extremely large-scale CCs. Although the authors mention Nyström approximations, they are not implemented or evaluated. * The paper focuses p
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Neural Networks and Applications
