Pathfinding in Self-Deleting Graphs
Michal Dvo\v{r}\'ak, Du\v{s}an Knop, Michal Opler, Jan Pokorn\'y, Ond\v{r}ej Such\'y, Krisztina Szil\'agyi

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity of pathfinding in self-deleting graphs, proving NP-hardness and W[1]-completeness results, and identifies fixed-parameter tractability under certain parameters.
Contribution
It introduces the complexity landscape of self-deleting pathfinding problems, establishing hardness results and identifying parameters for fixed-parameter tractability.
Findings
NP-hardness on outerplanar, bipartite graphs with degree 3
W[1]-completeness parameterized by path length and vertex cover
No polynomial kernel for combined parameters on 2-outerplanar graphs
Abstract
In this paper, we study the problem of pathfinding on traversal-dependent graphs, i.e., graphs whose edges change depending on the previously visited vertices. In particular, we study \emph{self-deleting graphs}, introduced by Carmesin et al. (Sarah Carmesin, David Woller, David Parker, Miroslav Kulich, and Masoumeh Mansouri. The Hamiltonian cycle and travelling salesperson problems with traversal-dependent edge deletion. J. Comput. Sci.), which consist of a graph and a function , where is the set of edges that will be deleted after visiting the vertex . In the \textsc{(Shortest) Self-Deleting --path} problem we are given a self-deleting graph and its vertices and , and we are asked to find a (shortest) path from to , such that it does not traverse an edge in after visiting for any vertex . We prove that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
