Expanding ML-Documentation Standards For Better Security
Cara Ellen Appel

TL;DR
This paper highlights the low security awareness in ML documentation and proposes expanding existing standards to include security details, aiming to improve ML-security practices.
Contribution
It introduces a novel extension to current ML documentation standards by adding a security section, based on Model Cards and Datasheets, to enhance security transparency.
Findings
Identifies gaps in current ML documentation practices.
Proposes an expanded documentation method including security info.
Highlights the need for standard adoption in practice.
Abstract
This article presents the current state of ML-security and of the documentation of ML-based systems, models and datasets in research and practice based on an extensive review of the existing literature. It shows a generally low awareness of security aspects among ML-practitioners and organizations and an often unstandardized approach to documentation, leading to overall low quality of ML-documentation. Existing standards are not regularly adopted in practice and IT-security aspects are often not included in documentation. Due to these factors, there is a clear need for improved security documentation in ML, as one step towards addressing the existing gaps in ML-security. To achieve this, we propose expanding existing documentation standards for ML-documentation to include a security section with specific security relevant information. Implementing this, a novel expanded method of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSecurity and Verification in Computing · Access Control and Trust
