Current Helicity in Response to Coronal Mass Ejections

TL;DR

This study combines 3D magnetohydrodynamic modeling and observational data to identify a current helicity reversal pattern associated with coronal mass ejections, enhancing understanding and potential prediction of solar eruptions.

Contribution

It reveals a novel helicity reversal pattern linked to CMEs, supported by simulations and observations, improving insight into eruption mechanisms and forecasting.

Findings

58% of cases showed pre-eruption helicity decrease

92% exhibited post-eruption helicity increase

Helicity pattern correlates with current redistribution and flare ribbon separation

Abstract

Coronal mass ejections (CMEs), powerful solar eruptions with massive plasma ejected into the interplanetary space, are caused by the release of the magnetic free enengy stored in coronal electric currents. Photospheric current helicity, defined as the integral of the product of vertical electric current density and vertical magnetic field ($H_c=\int j_zB_z\ dS$), serves as a key parameter in understanding the eruptions. Using a 3D magnetohydrodynamic model, we identify a current helicity reversal pattern associated with the eruption: a pre-eruption decrease and a post-eruption increase. This helicity reversal is attributed to the redistribution of electric currents: before the eruption, currents concentrate toward the polarity inversion line (PIL); after the eruption they move away from the PIL, consistent with the flare ribbon separation, which is caused by the upward progression reconnection site. To validate this pattern, we conducted an observational analysis of 50 $\geq$M5.0 eruptive flares. The results reveal that 58\% of cases exhibited a pre-eruption decrease and 92\% showed the post-eruption increase in current helicity. Detailed analysis of two cases with this reversal suggests that they share the same current redistribution pattern, consistent with the mechanism identified in the simulations. Moreover, the pre-eruption decrease could be observed clearly even in the long-term evolution of the two cases. Current helicity can serve as an indicator of when electric currents are built up for the subsequent eruption, and it has the potential to predict CMEs to some extent.