EEG Foundation Models: A Critical Review of Current Progress and Future Directions
Gayal Kuruppu, Neeraj Wagh, Vaclav Kremen, Sandipan Pati, Gregory Worrell, Yogatheesan Varatharajah

TL;DR
This paper critically reviews early EEG foundation models, analyzing their methodologies, evaluation strategies, and identifying key gaps to guide future research and enhance their practical utility in scientific and clinical settings.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of ten early EEG-FMs, highlighting common trends, methodological gaps, and proposing directions for standardization and real-world application.
Findings
Most EEG-FMs use transformer-based sequence modeling.
Evaluation strategies are heterogeneous and limited.
Standardized benchmarks and tools are needed for progress.
Abstract
Premise. Patterns of electrical brain activity recorded via electroencephalography (EEG) offer immense value for scientific and clinical investigations. The inability of supervised EEG encoders to learn robust EEG patterns and their over-reliance on expensive signal annotations have sparked a transition towards general-purpose self-supervised EEG encoders, i.e., EEG foundation models (EEG-FMs), for robust and scalable EEG feature extraction. However, the real-world readiness of early EEG-FMs and the rubrics for long-term research progress remain unclear. Objective. In this work, we conduct a review of ten early EEG-FMs to capture common trends and identify key directions for future development of EEG-FMs. Methods. We comparatively analyze each EEG-FM using three fundamental pillars of foundation modeling, namely the representation of input data, self-supervised modeling, and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
