Non-additive measures for quantum probability?
Gabriele Carcassi, Christine A. Aidala

TL;DR
This paper explores the potential role of non-additive measures in quantum probability, proposing that extending classical measure concepts could better capture quantum state counts and configurations, and discussing the mathematical and physical implications.
Contribution
It introduces the idea of non-additive measures in quantum mechanics, highlighting their properties and potential to extend probability calculus beyond classical additive measures.
Findings
Quantum measures may be inherently non-additive.
A generalized Radon-Nikodym derivative could extend probability calculus.
Non-additive measures align with quantum state counting and entropy concepts.
Abstract
It is well-established that quantum probability does not follow classical Kolmogorov probability calculus. Various approaches have been developed to loosen the axioms, of which the use of signed measures is the most successful (e.g. the Wigner quasiprobability distribution). As part of our larger effort Assumptions of Physics, we have been considering the various roles of measures, which are used in physics not only for probability, but also to quantify the count of possible states and configurations. These measures play a crucial role in classical mechanics, as they effectively define its geometric structure. If one tries to construct a parallel in quantum mechanics, the measure to quantify the count of states turns out to be non-additive. The proper extension of probability calculus may require the use of non-additive measures, which is something that, to our knowledge, has not yet…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
