CoNav Chair: Development and Evaluation of a Shared Control based Wheelchair for the Built Environment

TL;DR

The CoNav Chair is a shared control wheelchair that improves navigation safety and efficiency in constrained environments through a novel ROS-based design and preliminary user testing.

Contribution

This paper introduces the CoNav Chair, a shared control wheelchair with obstacle avoidance, and provides initial usability evaluation comparing manual, shared, and autonomous modes.

Findings

Shared control mode had fewer collisions.

Shared mode performed as well or better in task time and trajectory.

Users perceived shared control as safer and more efficient.

Abstract

As the global population of people with disabilities (PWD) continues to grow, so will the need for mobility solutions that promote independent living and social integration. Wheelchairs are vital for the mobility of PWD in both indoor and outdoor environments. The current SOTA in powered wheelchairs is based on either manually controlled or fully autonomous modes of operation, offering limited flexibility and often proving difficult to navigate in spatially constrained environments. Moreover, research on robotic wheelchairs has focused predominantly on complete autonomy or improved manual control; approaches that can compromise efficiency and user trust. To overcome these challenges, this paper introduces the CoNav Chair, a smart wheelchair based on the Robot Operating System (ROS) and featuring shared control navigation and obstacle avoidance capabilities that are intended to enhance navigational efficiency, safety, and ease of use for the user. The paper outlines the CoNav Chair's design and presents a preliminary usability evaluation comparing three distinct navigation modes, namely, manual, shared, and fully autonomous, conducted with 21 healthy, unimpaired participants traversing an indoor building environment. Study findings indicated that the shared control navigation framework had significantly fewer collisions and performed comparably, if not superior to the autonomous and manual modes, on task completion time, trajectory length, and smoothness; and was perceived as being safer and more efficient based on user reported subjective assessments of usability. Overall, the CoNav system demonstrated acceptable safety and performance, laying the foundation for subsequent usability testing with end users, namely, PWDs who rely on a powered wheelchair for mobility.