Towards a Non-Binary View of IPv6 Adoption
Sulyab Thottungal Valapu, John Heidemann

TL;DR
This paper investigates the nuanced state of IPv6 adoption across users, servers, and cloud providers, revealing significant variability and highlighting areas for improvement in deployment practices.
Contribution
It introduces a non-binary perspective on IPv6 adoption, analyzing traffic patterns, web service readiness, and cloud support to provide a comprehensive view of current deployment levels.
Findings
IPv6 traffic varies greatly across users and time.
Only 12.6% of top websites are fully IPv6-enabled.
Cloud tenant IPv6 adoption varies significantly among providers.
Abstract
Twelve years have passed since World IPv6 Launch Day, but what is the current state of IPv6 deployment? Prior work has examined IPv6 status as a binary: can a user do any IPv6? As deployment increases, we must consider a more nuanced, non-binary perspective on IPv6: how much and often can a user or a service use IPv6? We consider this question as a client, server, and cloud provider. Considering the client's perspective, we observe user traffic. We see that the fraction of IPv6 traffic a user sends varies greatly, both across users and day-by-day, with a standard deviation of over 15%. We show this variation occurs for two main reasons. First, IPv6 traffic is primarily human-generated, thus showing diurnal patterns. Second, some services lead with full IPv6 adoption, while others lag with partial or no support, so as users do different things their fraction of IPv6 varies. We look at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
