Efficacy of Galaxy Catalogues for following up gravitational wave events

TL;DR

This study evaluates the effectiveness of galaxy catalogues, especially mass-ranked galaxy targeting, for electromagnetic follow-up of gravitational wave events during LIGO O4, highlighting their utility at lower distances and limitations at larger distances.

Contribution

It provides an analysis of galaxy catalogue utility with mass prioritization for GW follow-up, considering different distance regimes and catalogue completeness.

Findings

Galaxy catalogues are more useful at lower distances with higher completeness.

Mass ranking increases efficiency in targeting galaxies for follow-up.

Catalogue-based searches outperform 3D searches beyond 300 Mpc.

Abstract

The detection of gravitational waves (GW) by the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) network has opened up a new era in astrophysics. The identification of the electromagnetic counterparts of GW sources is crucial for multi-messenger astronomy, one way of which is to use galaxy catalogues to guide optical follow-up observations. In this paper, we test the utility of galaxy-targeted approach with mass prioritised galaxy ranking for the ongoing LIGO O4 run. We have used the simulated results for the expected LIGO O4 events and the NED-LVS galaxy catalogue and based our study for small field of view telescopes, specifically the GROWTH-India Telescope (GIT). With the increase in sensitivity of LIGO/Virgo in the ongoing observing run O4, the expected number of total detections have gone up but most of these are also now poorly localised. We show that a larger volume covered in the same field-of-view (FoV) on the sky results in a large increase in the total number of galaxies in each FoV. A significant top-heaviness is observed in the mass-ranked list of galaxies, which still number to a few thousand in most cases. At larger distances, such high numbers of deep follow-up observations are infeasible in most cases rendering galaxy catalogues useful in limited cases, but these are still useful at lower distances where LVK detectors are currently sensitive and where galaxy completeness is higher. We also explore the effect of mass-filling to account for galaxy catalogue incompleteness at large distances. If mass-filled probabilities are considered as the metric for ranking and coverage, we find that the conventional 2D probability search performs better than a 3D galaxy catalogue (without mass-filling) based search at distances larger than 300 Mpc (upto which NED-LVS is ~70% complete), and using 3D mass times probability in each tile performs better for nearby events.