Einstein Fields: A Neural Perspective To Computational General Relativity
Sandeep Suresh Cranganore, Andrei Bodnar, Arturs Berzins, Johannes Brandstetter

TL;DR
Einstein Fields introduces a neural representation that compresses four-dimensional spacetime simulations into compact neural networks, enabling efficient storage, accurate derivatives, and natural emergence of dynamics, advancing computational general relativity.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel neural tensor field model for encoding spacetime metrics, achieving significant compression and improved derivative accuracy over traditional methods.
Findings
Up to 4,000-fold reduction in storage memory.
Retention of five to seven decimal places of accuracy.
Derivative calculations are up to five orders of magnitude more accurate.
Abstract
We introduce Einstein Fields, a neural representation designed to compress computationally intensive four-dimensional numerical relativity simulations into compact implicit neural network weights. By modeling the metric, the core tensor field of general relativity, Einstein Fields enable the derivation of physical quantities via automatic differentiation. Unlike conventional neural fields (e.g., signed distance, occupancy, or radiance fields), Einstein Fields fall into the class of Neural Tensor Fields with the key difference that, when encoding the spacetime geometry into neural field representations, dynamics emerge naturally as a byproduct. Our novel implicit approach demonstrates remarkable potential, including continuum modeling of four-dimensional spacetime, mesh-agnosticity, storage efficiency, derivative accuracy, and ease of use. It achieves up to a -fold reduction in…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
- I like the clear pipeline and library, and a JAX code for this seems useful for the NR community. The graph from metric to derived quantities is explicit and leverages forward‑mode Jacobians/Hessians with einsum operations which is nice. This is a useful contribution of reusable tooling for GR in ML, and I think it is a good contribution by itself. - I liked the ablations accounting done in 4.2, it is nice and I think quite useful to see the effect of every modification to the training process
First, my main concerns: 1. First, I think the scope and storage comparisons are misaligned with NR. The paper advertises 4D compression of NR simulations, but the primary experiments are analytic snapshots at t = 0 (Schwarzschild/Kerr); only the linearized‑gravity toy has time evolution. The compression factors compare MLP weights to explicit dense grids counted as "#points x 4 bytes" in FLOAT32, which is not how NR codes actually store data (they would use adaptive mesh refinement stored with
- Outstanding efficiency and accuracy are shown when representing the symmetry of the simulations. - This paper is especially well written and well presented. - The problems addressed by the new tool is of interest to a wide community.
- I am not entirely sure that how interesting this paper will be for the readership of ICLR, of whom so few are well versed in this area.
## Strengths **Originality**: This paper presents a novel application of neural fields to general relativity, introducing the first implicit neural representation for tensor-valued spacetime geometries. The approach creatively adapts neural field techniques from computer vision to computational physics, with several original contributions. **Quality**: The paper demonstrates strong technical rigor with comprehensive validation across multiple canonical GR test cases (Schwarzschild, Kerr, grav
## Weaknesses **Limited experimental scope**: The validation is restricted to three analytical solutions to Einstein's field equations (Schwarzschild, Kerr, linearized gravitational waves). While these are canonical test cases, they represent idealized scenarios far simpler than realistic numerical relativity (NR) simulations. **Limited contextualization within scientific computing:** While the introduction mentions neural fields and ML for scientific computing, it lacks: (1) discussion of pr
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational Physics and Python Applications
