Low-redshift analogues of cosmic noon galaxies as laboratories for clumpy star formation
Jorge M. Santos-Junior, Thiago S. Goncalves, Luidhy Santana-Silva, Arianna Cortesi, Karin Menendez-Delmestre, and Amanda E. de Araujo-Carvalho

TL;DR
This study examines low-redshift galaxies similar to high-redshift cosmic noon galaxies to understand clumpy star formation, revealing that clump properties and apparent sizes are affected by observational effects and redshift, aiding interpretation of distant galaxy observations.
Contribution
The paper provides detailed analysis of local analogues to high-redshift galaxies, highlighting how observational effects influence perceived clump sizes and supporting the growth of clump sizes with redshift.
Findings
Clumps have sizes of a few hundred parsecs with low velocity shear and high velocity dispersion.
High-redshift clumps appear larger due to clustering and observational resolution effects.
Results support increasing clump sizes with redshift, but not to kpc scales without advanced techniques.
Abstract
It has been established that a significant fraction of star formation at high-redshift occurs in clumpy galaxies. The properties of clumps and their formation mechanisms, however, remain highly debated. In this work we analyze a sample of 18 Supercompact Ultraviolet Luminous Galaxies observed with the OSIRIS spectrograph at the Keck Telescope, targeting their Pa-alpha emission. These galaxies, although at z~0.1-0.2, share many similar properties with star-forming galaxies at cosmic noon. We find a total of 84 star-forming clumps with typical sizes of a few hundred parsecs. The star-forming clumps exhibit low values of velocity shear (~12 km/s) and high velocity dispersion (~70 km/s). The dynamical masses of the clumps are typically higher than gas masses inferred from the measured star-formation rates of each clump. We also artificially redshift our data to emulate observations at z=2.2…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
