Automated Novelty Evaluation of Academic Paper: A Collaborative Approach Integrating Human and Large Language Model Knowledge
Wenqing Wu, Chengzhi Zhang, Yi Zhao

TL;DR
This paper presents a collaborative approach combining human expertise and large language models to improve the automated evaluation of academic paper novelty, especially focusing on method innovation detection.
Contribution
It introduces a novel fusion module with Sparse-Attention to integrate human and LLM knowledge for better novelty prediction of academic papers.
Findings
Our method outperforms multiple baselines in novelty detection accuracy.
The fusion module effectively combines human and LLM insights.
Experimental results demonstrate significant performance improvements.
Abstract
Novelty is a crucial criterion in the peer review process for evaluating academic papers. Traditionally, it's judged by experts or measure by unique reference combinations. Both methods have limitations: experts have limited knowledge, and the effectiveness of the combination method is uncertain. Moreover, it's unclear if unique citations truly measure novelty. The large language model (LLM) possesses a wealth of knowledge, while human experts possess judgment abilities that the LLM does not possess. Therefore, our research integrates the knowledge and abilities of LLM and human experts to address the limitations of novelty assessment. One of the most common types of novelty in academic papers is the introduction of new methods. In this paper, we propose leveraging human knowledge and LLM to assist pretrained language models (PLMs, e.g. BERT etc.) in predicting the method novelty of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
