Subinjective and Subprojective Extension-Reflecting Modules
Engin B\"uy\"uka\c{s}{\i}k

TL;DR
This paper investigates conditions under which classes of modules related to subinjectivity and subprojectivity are closed under extensions, providing new characterizations and examples over various rings, including QF-rings.
Contribution
It establishes criteria ensuring extension-closure of subinjective and subprojective classes, especially when modules have injective hulls that are projective or are homomorphic images of modules with combined properties.
Findings
Extension-closure of rIn(M) when injective hull of M is projective.
Extension-closure of rPr(M) when M is a homomorphic image of a module that is both projective and injective.
Over QF-rings, rIn(M) and rPr(M) are always extension-closed.
Abstract
Given a right R-module M and any short exact sequence of right R-modules \[ 0 \to A \to B \to C \to 0, \] it is well known that if both A and C belong to the subinjectivity domain (resp., the subprojectivity domain ) of M, then B also belongs to the corresponding domain. Module classes satisfying this closure property are said to be closed under extensions. Let and Unlike and , the classes and are not, in general, closed under extensions. In this paper, we investigate certain classes of modules and rings that ensure the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRings, Modules, and Algebras
