Collaborative Trustworthiness for Good Decision Making in Autonomous Systems

TL;DR

This paper introduces a collaborative trustworthiness framework for autonomous systems that enhances decision-making reliability by using quality-based aggregation and formal belief models, addressing conflicts in shared data.

Contribution

It presents a novel trustworthiness approach leveraging perception quality and formal BDD models for efficient collaborative decision making in autonomous systems.

Findings

Improved trustworthiness in autonomous decision making.

Efficient belief aggregation using BDDs.

Enhanced reliability in complex environments.

Abstract

Autonomous systems are becoming an integral part of many application domains, like in the mobility sector. However, ensuring their safe and correct behaviour in dynamic and complex environments remains a significant challenge, where systems should autonomously make decisions e.g., about manoeuvring. We propose in this paper a general collaborative approach for increasing the level of trustworthiness in the environment of operation and improve reliability and good decision making in autonomous system. In the presence of conflicting information, aggregation becomes a major issue for trustworthy decision making based on collaborative data sharing. Unlike classical approaches in the literature that rely on consensus or majority as aggregation rule, we exploit the fact that autonomous systems have different quality attributes like perception quality. We use this criteria to determine which autonomous systems are trustworthy and borrow concepts from social epistemology to define aggregation and propagation rules, used for automated decision making. We use Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs) as formal models for beliefs aggregation and propagation, and formulate reduction rules to reduce the size of the BDDs and allow efficient computation structures for collaborative automated reasoning.