Auditing Facial Emotion Recognition Datasets for Posed Expressions and Racial Bias
Rina Khan, Catherine Stinson

TL;DR
This paper audits facial emotion recognition datasets for posed expressions and racial bias, revealing significant posed images and racial disparities that affect model performance and fairness in real-world applications.
Contribution
It introduces a methodology to identify posed images in FER datasets and highlights racial biases affecting model predictions and fairness.
Findings
Many images labeled as in-the-wild were actually posed.
FER models perform worse on spontaneous expressions.
Models tend to misclassify darker-skinned individuals' emotions.
Abstract
Facial expression recognition (FER) algorithms classify facial expressions into emotions such as happy, sad, or angry. An evaluative challenge facing FER algorithms is the fall in performance when detecting spontaneous expressions compared to posed expressions. An ethical (and evaluative) challenge facing FER algorithms is that they tend to perform poorly for people of some races and skin colors. These challenges are linked to the data collection practices employed in the creation of FER datasets. In this study, we audit two state-of-the-art FER datasets. We take random samples from each dataset and examine whether images are spontaneous or posed. In doing so, we propose a methodology for identifying spontaneous or posed images. We discover a significant number of images that were posed in the datasets purporting to consist of in-the-wild images. Since performance of FER models vary…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEmotion and Mood Recognition
