Multiobjective Aerodynamic Design Optimization of the NASA Common Research Model
Kade Carlson, Ashwin Renganathan

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel multiobjective Bayesian optimization method for aircraft aerodynamic design, improving sample efficiency and accuracy over existing approaches by generating Pareto optimal solutions using Gaussian process surrogates.
Contribution
The paper proposes a new batch Pareto optimal Thompson sampling method that enhances multiobjective aerodynamic design optimization in terms of efficiency and scalability.
Findings
Outperforms state-of-the-art methods in synthetic experiments
Achieves better Pareto front approximation in NASA research model case
Demonstrates improved sample efficiency and accuracy
Abstract
Aircraft aerodynamic design optimization must account for the varying operating conditions along the cruise segment as opposed to designing at one fixed operating condition, to arrive at more realistic designs. Conventional approaches address this by performing a ``multi-point'' optimization that assumes a weighted average of the objectives at a set of sub-segments along the cruise segment. We argue that since such multi-point approaches are, inevitably, biased by the specification of the weights, they can lead to sub-optimal designs. Instead, we propose to optimize the aircraft design at multiple sub-segments simultaneously -- that is, via multiobjective optimization that leads to a set of Pareto optimal solutions. However, existing work in multiobjective optimization suffers from (i) lack of sample efficiency (that is, keeping the number of function evaluations to convergence…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
