Operator Learning for Consolidation: An Architectural Comparison for DeepONet Variants
Yongjin Choi, Chenying Liu, Jorge Macedo

TL;DR
This paper compares various DeepONet architectures for modeling consolidation in geotechnical engineering, introducing a Fourier feature-enhanced model that significantly improves accuracy and computational speed, especially in 3D scenarios.
Contribution
It systematically evaluates DeepONet variants for consolidation, proposing a Fourier feature-enhanced architecture that overcomes previous limitations and extends to 3D applications.
Findings
Model 3 outperforms standard DeepONets but struggles with high variation.
Model 4 captures rapidly varying functions effectively.
Speedup in 3D reaches approximately 1,000x compared to traditional solvers.
Abstract
Deep Operator Networks (DeepONets) have emerged as a powerful surrogate modeling framework for learning solution operators in PDE-governed systems. While their use is expanding across engineering disciplines, applications in geotechnical engineering remain limited. This study systematically evaluates several DeepONet architectures for the consolidation problem. We initially consider three architectures: a standard DeepONet with the coefficient of consolidation embedded in the branch net (Models 1 and 2), and a physics-inspired architecture with the coefficient embedded in the trunk net (Model 3). Results show that Model 3 outperforms the standard configurations (Models 1 and 2) but still has limitations when the target solution (excess pore pressures) exhibits significant variation. To overcome this limitation, we propose a Trunknet Fourier feature-enhanced DeepONet (Model 4) that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTunneling and Rock Mechanics
