Epidemic spread: limiting contacts to regular circles is not necessarily the safest option
J\~oao Gabriel Sim\~oes Delboni, Gabriel Fabricius

TL;DR
This study shows that limiting contacts to regular circles may not always be the safest strategy in epidemic control, as frequent contacts significantly influence outbreak severity.
Contribution
The paper introduces a mathematical model analyzing the impact of frequent versus occasional contacts on epidemic spread, highlighting the importance of contact structure in mitigation strategies.
Findings
Higher frequent contact prevalence leads to higher epidemic peaks.
Deterministic recovery amplifies the effect of contact structure on epidemic dynamics.
Homogeneous mixing approximation is less accurate when contact patterns are structured.
Abstract
When a new infectious disease (or a new strain of an existing one) emerges, as in the recent COVID-19 pandemic, different types of mobility restrictions are considered to slow down or mitigate the spread of the disease. The measures to be adopted require carefully weighing the social cost against their impact on disease control. In this work, we analyze, in a context of mobility restrictions, the role of frequent versus occasional contacts in epidemic spread. We develop an individual-based mathematical model where frequent contacts among individuals (at home, work, schools) and occasional contacts (at stores, transport, etc.) are considered. We define several contact structures by varying the relative weight of frequent and occasional contacts while keeping the same initial growth rate of the epidemic. We find the remarkable result that the more frequent contacts prevail over occasional…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
