Numerical simulations of jet launching and breakout from collapsars
Gerardo Urrutia, Agnieszka Janiuk, Hector Olivares

TL;DR
This study uses self-consistent 2.5-D GRMHD simulations to model jet formation and breakout in collapsars, revealing how magnetic fields and progenitor structure influence jet dynamics and gamma-ray burst properties.
Contribution
It presents the first self-consistent simulations from black hole horizon to stellar surface, incorporating accretion dynamics and magnetic field effects in collapsar jet formation.
Findings
Jets are launched by strong dipolar magnetic fields from magnetically arrested disks.
Breakout times range from 1.8 to 3.5 seconds, with luminosities up to 7×10^{52} erg/s.
Initial magnetic field strength and progenitor density distribution critically affect jet structure and evolution.
Abstract
Long Gamma-Ray Bursts (LGRBs) are often associated with the collapse of stripped-envelope massive stars. Powerful relativistic jets drill through the stellar envelope before the gamma emission. Previous hydrodynamical studies imposed jets artificially, neglecting accretion dynamics, while the central engine simulations have reproduced jet launching via the Blandford-Znajek mechanism focusing on the inner core regions. However, both the central engine and the progenitor structure are crucial to determining the jet's evolution. In this study, we present axisymmetric (2.5-D) GRMHD simulations that self-consistently follow jet formation from the black-hole horizon to breakout at the stellar surface (~cm). The setup assumes a Kerr black hole with spin in the centre of three progenitor models, varying the magnetic-field strength and geometry. Relativistic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHigh-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
