Observational mapping of the mass discrepancy in eclipsing binaries. A new self-contained framework for concurrent analysis of photometric and spectroscopic time series
Nadya Serebriakova, Andrew Tkachenko, Cole Johnston, Kre\v{s}imir Pavlovski, Conny Aerts

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new self-contained framework for analyzing photometric and spectroscopic data of eclipsing binaries, aiming to address the systematic mass discrepancy issue by reducing methodological biases.
Contribution
The authors develop and validate a novel framework that simultaneously models data to minimize biases and explore solution degeneracies in eclipsing binary analysis.
Findings
The framework recovers multiple solutions, including one that reduces the mass discrepancy.
Methodological biases can significantly contribute to the observed mass discrepancy.
External constraints are needed to resolve solution degeneracies.
Abstract
The mass discrepancy problem, observed in high-mass stars within eclipsing binaries, highlights systematic differences between dynamical and evolutionary mass estimates, challenging the accuracy of stellar evolution models. We aim to determine whether analysis methods directly contribute to this discrepancy and to assess how methodological improvements might reduce or clarify it. To address this, we developed a new self-contained framework that simultaneously models the photometric and spectroscopic data, minimising biases introduced by traditional iterative approaches and enabling consistent parameter optimisation. We present this framework alongside validation tests on synthetic data and demonstrate its application to three well-studied observed binaries, including one system known for its pronounced mass discrepancy. The framework recovers multiple viable solutions from distinct…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
