On the Efficiency of Training Robust Decision Trees
Benedict Gerlach, Marie Anastacio, Holger H. Hoos

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the efficiency of training robust decision trees, proposing a new automatic perturbation size selection method, and analyzing the time trade-offs in training and certification processes.
Contribution
It introduces a simple algorithm for automatic perturbation size selection and demonstrates efficiency gains by estimating from smaller models.
Findings
Perturbation size can be estimated from smaller models.
Verification time is not correlated with training time.
Efficiency improvements in robust decision tree training pipeline.
Abstract
As machine learning gets adopted into the industry quickly, trustworthiness is increasingly in focus. Yet, efficiency and sustainability of robust training pipelines still have to be established. In this work, we consider a simple pipeline for training adversarially robust decision trees and investigate the efficiency of each step. Our pipeline consists of three stages. Firstly, we choose the perturbation size automatically for each dataset. For that, we introduce a simple algorithm, instead of relying on intuition or prior work. Moreover, we show that the perturbation size can be estimated from smaller models than the one intended for full training, and thus significant gains in efficiency can be achieved. Secondly, we train state-of-the-art adversarial training methods and evaluate them regarding both their training time and adversarial accuracy. Thirdly, we certify the robustness of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Neural Networks and Applications · Machine Learning and Data Classification
